What is a Homeopathic Proving
“ If man thinks of the totality as
constituted of independent fragments, then that is how his mind will
tend to operate, but if he can include everything coherently and
harmoniously in an overall whole that is undivided, unbroken, and
without a border then his mind will tend to move in a similar way,
and from this will flow an orderly action within the whole. ”
David Bohm
Homoeopathic
proving is the process in which new remedies are
discovered for use in homoeopathic treatment. Provings involve
provers, 'healthy' individuals taking a newly prepared homoeopathic
remedy. A prover, under the sway of the remedy, is believed to
exhibit symptoms that reflect the properties of the substance. The
symptoms experienced by provers are collectively analysed to build
the foundations of a new remedy picture.
The process of proving has been
credited to the founder of homoeopathy, Samuel Hahnemann.
During his life Hahnemann proved at least a hundred different
remedies and built the basis of the Materia Medica that is used
today. During the hundred and fifty years since, some two and a half
thousand remedies have been added, some through rigorous provings,
others through noting the effects of accidental poisonings. Some
homoeopaths feel that there are now more medicines than we need and
that new provings are a waste of time; others feel that there are
still many important medicines to be discovered and that old
remedies need to be reproved both to clarify their symptoms and to
bring them into focus in the light of the changes in society over
two hundred years.
Hahnemann was, among his many
skills, what we would call today a research scientist and the
provings that he conducted were of a very high standard. Sadly not
all those that followed him were as scrupulous and many very poor
provings were conducted over the years. Over the last twenty years
there has been enormous growth in professional homoeopathy all over
the world but especially in
A major force in this change
has been the homoeopath Jeremy Sherr. Not only has he given
us valuable pictures of remedies such as Chocolate, Hydrogen and
Scorpion, but he developed and published a protocol for the conduct
of provings that is rigorous and based on the work of Hahnemann.
Provings should be conducted on healthy individuals; however, very
few people would claim to be a hundred per cent healthy and this is
one of the many areas where compromises have to be made. No proving
is perfect, but if it is well conducted the imperfections are above
board and can be taken into account when it is interpreted. Most of
the provings done today are done by student homoeopaths, just as
they were in Hahnemann's time.
When Hahnemann began proving
remedies he worked primarily on the poisonous substances that were
then used as medicines. These included minerals such as
Insusbstantial things, such as magnetism, were also potentized and
proved. It is often not realised that only a few years ago a medical
student's basic equipment consisted of a stethoscope, a blood
pressure gauge and an electronic magnetic field generator.
Constantine Hering, one of Hahnemann's students, discovered the
powerful venom of the Bushmaster snake in the Amazon jungle. He
accidentally absorbed some through a cut and so conducted the first
proving of Lachesis. The Bee and the Tarantula spider also became
valuable remedies.
There is now a well-developed protocol for how substances are used.
Minerals and chemicals are used in their purest form. Either the
whole of a plant or its most active part is tinctured in alcohol and
water. Insects are used whole, which creates problems for vegetarian
and vegans when the remedies Apis (bee), Tarantula or Scorpion are
indicated. Reptiles are represented by their venoms. Mammals are
represented by their milks. This started with dog's milk, which was
a folk remedy for Diptheria and which, when proved, was shown to be
a valuable remedy. Bird remedies are made from a feather and/or a
drop of blood.
Alternative medicine is often
criticised by conventional scientists as completely unscientific.
Homoeopathy, since the time of Hahnemann, has been based on the
clear, scientific collection of evidence, and the best homoeopathy
continues to be so.
Provings pre-requisites
The pre-requisites for the prover, drug & the physician are the following:
the PROVER:
| -
Must be healthy physically and mentally |
| -
Should be honest, lover of truth that he can narrate
symptoms exactly |
| - Should have the capacity to express symptoms in exact manner |
| -
Should be keen observer |
| -
Should be introspective that can look within himself |
| -
Should be conscientious |
the DRUG or SUBSTANCE:
| - Must be pure |
| - Must be genuine |
| - Must be of known
origin |
| - Should be full of
energy |
| - Indigenous drug
procured fresh juice should be mixed with alcohol then
should be given |
| - Exotic drug should
be procured fresh, made into tincture of dry powder, to be
taken with equal volume of water |
| - Gum and resin,
salts should be dissolved in water then to be given |
| - Medicines obtained
in dry form are made into powder should mixed with hot water
and taken as infusion |
the PROVING DIRECTOR:
|
- Should be unprejuidiced |
|
- Should give full attention to the
prover |
|
- Should trust
his prover |
| - Should be
Circumspective |
| - Should have the
capacity of proper judgement |
|
- Should have clear knowledge about
narcotic, alternating action, idiocyncrasy, surrogate |
Hahnemann established
experimental human pharmacology by Proving Drugs on
healthy human beings, obtained data on the pure effects of drugs
which he recorded in his ‘Chronic Diseases’ and in the ‘Materia
Medica Pura’. He arranged all the datas according to a
scheme of locations and presented in a systematic manner. He
ensured complete objectivity by faithful recording the effects
as experienced by the provers, retaining their language as far
as possible. In his introductory remarks his personal comments
and observations have been recorded separately. Even today his
directions are rigidly adhered to in the Homoeopathic
Pharmacopoeia.
In our Materia Medica,
symptoms of many drugs have been recorded, based only on the
symptoms of poisoning and not as the effects of drugs provings.
These toxicological symptoms may have their value but they
should be kept apart as very often it is not advisable to take
them into account in medical prescriptions.
The effects
of medicines can be ascertained from different sources,
including :
-
Proving on healthy human being
-
Toxicological studies in animals
-
Clinical experiences
The human Drug-Proving
could not be done to the extent of producing irreversible
pathological changes. The pathological data owe their origin
chiefly to clinical observations, supported by reports of
accidental poisoning and a few animal provings that were
conducted. Thus Homoeopathic Materia Medica is essentially
a record of human functional pathology.
It is known to all that
certain substances which is inert in crude state, acquire
remarkable powers to influence susceptibility when they are
prepared as per direction in homoeopathic pharmacopoeia and
administered according to definite plan as has done in well
conducted provings.
It is also required to
know the following:
|
Nature of the Drug |
Susceptibility |
Dose |
Repetition |
|
STRONG
(Toxic, Poison, Narcotic) |
LOW |
Potentised form Less Quantity |
Stop at the onset
of slightest action. |
|
MEDIUM |
MODERATELY HIGH |
Potentised Moderate quantity |
Repeat till the
action starts. Should not repeat until reaction becomes
statusquo. |
|
WEAK |
HIGHER |
Frequent Large, crude |
Frequent repetition. |
In a proving, a drug is
administered till it meets the susceptibility and evoke the
response. Further stimulation is then suspended, otherwise, clarity
of response tends to get blurred. The specific capacity of the drug
to affect health acts on the susceptibility in a prover to give rise
to the final picture in a drug proving. General experience
indicates that a sensitive and gracile subject is extremely
susceptible; where as, the coarse type requires repeated
stimulations through the lower potencies. Not all provers manifest
susceptibility to lower potency. Some of the finer indications have
been obtained by provings conducted with the 30th potency
and beyond. Inert substances require considerable release of energy
through 30th potency and beyond before they affect
susceptibility.
Essential knowledge in Drug Proving
Following are the knowledge essential for the purpose of Drug Proving :
|
PRECAUTIONS |
RECORDING |
DRUG IS
SAID TO BE WELL PROVED |
|
Should not over
exert physically as well as mentally. Should have no
urgent business, this may district attention. |
It must be
ADEQUATE, ACCURATE, COMPLETE. |
When : No new symptoms
occur even after repetition. Drug should be
proved on the both sexes. |
In Homoeopathic Drug
Provings on healthy subjects, volunteers (provers) receive the
medicinally active substances over a definite period of time. All
striking changes and symptoms affecting the body or psyche are than
carefully recorded and evaluated and described in detail e.g.
intensity of individual symptoms, their variation at different times
of day, associated circumstances and modifying influences. All newly
occurring symptoms, in this context, are taken as symptoms, which
systematically collected to form the picture of the drug substances
being proved.
The details of physical and
clinical examinations along with constitutional features (mental and
physical attributes) are recorded in a ‘Pre-Trial Proforma’.
This proforma is reserved throughout the period of proving and even
after the trial is over, for reference, as and when required.
The purpose of provings is
primarily to find the pictures of new remedies, or to deepen the
understanding of old ones. There are, however, many important side
effects. New remedies have helped many patients, who might never
have been so deeply cured if remedies like Chocolate, Hydrogen and
Scorpion had not been understood.
Also, it is strange how often fate puts people in a proving that
helps them.
Provings are not always
pleasant, some of the symptoms experienced can be painful or
uncomfortable. It is important that provers have the support of the
proving structure and of an experienced homoeopath. Sometimes the
prover will become stuck in some part of the proving state and he
will need another remedy, an antidote, to bring him out of it.
However, almost all provers come out of the experienced unchanged,
or more often, healthier, stronger and wiser.
Provings are also a powerful
pedagogic tool. They help students to learn and understand the
process through which the remedies they use came to be understood.
They also help students to better understand what symptoms are and
what they feel like. We all become so used to our own selves and our
own symptoms that we do not see them clearly in ourselves or in our
patients; a proving forces homoeopaths to look very closely at
symptoms and so to understand what exactly a symptom is and what it
means.
To get involved in a
Drug Proving either as a prover or a supervisor, please contact us
at
research@visvitaliseducation.com
Next meeting about Drug
Proving will take place Sunday, 21st February 2010 at
‘The Natural Healing Rooms’, Clonakilty, Co. Cork (Ireland). Next
proving will begin in May 2010.

